Stipe Tolj wrote: > Rene Kluwen wrote: > >> Because I know that gwlib serves more purposes than just Kannel: How >> about creating a seperate CVS tree for it and distribute it >> independantly? >> >> Just a thought. > > hmmm, this would go into the Apache portable runtime (apr) issue, right? > > I don't think the code is that "good" splited from gw/ and gwlib/ to have > it really seperated into cvs modules, IMO. > > But it's indeed an interesting idea. Other opintions about this?!
yes, convert the whole kannel cvs tree into subversion and put gwlib as extra module and with externals technique from subversion link gwlib to the usual place ;) p.s. I'm not gonna to rewrite kannel to use apr: a) external dependency; b) too much code changes for things that already working well with gwlib > > Stipe > > mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Vogelsanger Weg 80 > 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany > > phone: +49.211.74845.0 > fax: +49.211.74845.299 > > mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de > http://www.wapme-systems.de/ > ------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Thanks, Alex
