> "why had we all that coding for gwlib"? Keeping gwlib for gwlib's sake seems pointless. The APR is a stable, portable and well maintained framework for applications like Kannel (or Apache, Subversion, you name it).
I really think that maintaining yet another system abstraction layer just for Kannel (and not a good one: gwlib is not really portable. The windows port relies on Cygwin for portability) is somewhat pointless and smells like the "not invented here" syndrome. Regards Joerg -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- Von: Stipe Tolj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Februar 2005 16:21 An: Pommnitz, J�rg Cc: [email protected] Betreff: Re: AW: Looking to open source software that uses gwlib Hi J�rg, Pommnitz, J�rg wrote: > While you mentioned the APR: would it make sense to port gwlib to the APR > (Step 1) and then move to APR completely? hmmm, it's like a sexy thing to think about it. But a) would be a horror job in terms of effort and b) would imply "why had we all that coding for gwlib"? ;) Stipe mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299 mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de http://www.wapme-systems.de/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
