Alexander Malysh wrote:
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Rene Kluwen wrote:
Because I know that gwlib serves more purposes than just Kannel: How about creating a seperate CVS tree for it and distribute it independantly?
Just a thought.
hmmm, this would go into the Apache portable runtime (apr) issue, right?
I don't think the code is that "good" splited from gw/ and gwlib/ to have it really seperated into cvs modules, IMO.
But it's indeed an interesting idea. Other opintions about this?!
yes, convert the whole kannel cvs tree into subversion and put gwlib as extra module and with externals technique from subversion link gwlib to the usual place ;)
p.s. I'm not gonna to rewrite kannel to use apr: a) external dependency; b) too much code changes for things that already working well with gwlib
+1 on this. I didn't "request" this or put this to discussion.
Even while it "may" be a cool thing to think about ;)
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 D�sseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0 fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de http://www.wapme-systems.de/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
