Hi Alex, On Tue, 2006-10-17 at 18:20 +0200, Alexander Malysh wrote: > please find at https://olek.homeip.net/~alex/store-spool.patch patch that > adds additinaly support for store spool directory. > I added two new config options: > 'store-type' - allow us to define which type to use (file, spool) > 'store-location' - allow setting either file or spool location > > Option 'store-file' is deprecated but still supported with a warning that > two above options should be used. > By default if no 'store-type' defined store file is used. > > Advantages of the store spool is: > 1) each message stored as one file, so it's easier to drop one specific > message from the queue > 2) no need to have queued messages twice in the memory > 3) no locking required -> no race conditions as is the case for store file > 4) some other that I don't know yet :) > > Please test it and give me feedback.
Sorry for the delay. I have briefly read over the patch, and it looks good to me (that means I'm +1). I wonder why don't we just use a database. Hrm. Maybe I'll give it a try sometime. -- .O. ..O Enver ALTIN | http://enveraltin.com/ OOO Software developer @ Parkyeri | http://www.parkyeri.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
