What is the load performance like with this patch?, I know with the store file, and the queue grows quite large,eg maybe 30,000+ store size (it is ram dependent), if m/c doesn't have the physical ram to do the store_dump process, your kannel is very quickly in quicksand............. Fred
----- Original Message ----- From: "Vincent CHAVANIS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 10:19 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support > IHO, we need more that "++1 seems to work" > > This patch is pretty long and should not be voted with reason "it seems ok" > We need to compile it, test it, and completely understand what every lines > are doing. > > Trivial issues are not affected to this (means less 10 lines of diffs). > > regards > > Vincent. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Enver ALTIN" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:49 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] store spool directory support > > > >
