Stipe Tolj wrote:
BTW, I'd like to avoid a single config directive for ALL substritute rules. I
know we have this "mechanism" of a sort of "list" in the config processing, but
this get's horror to read in the end if you have, let's say, 30 rules or
something.
Can't we think a bit to have "multi-directives" with the same name in a group?
Obviously we would have to tweak the gwlib/cfg.[ch] here ;)
I think this is an architecture issue, and I leave it to you in deep
respect :-)
If we have "multi-directives", I'd be lucky to use them...
Cheers,
Georg
