-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Georg von Zezschwitz wrote:
> Stipe Tolj wrote: > >> BTW, I'd like to avoid a single config directive for ALL substritute >> rules. I >> know we have this "mechanism" of a sort of "list" in the config >> processing, but >> this get's horror to read in the end if you have, let's say, 30 rules >> or something. >> >> Can't we think a bit to have "multi-directives" with the same name in >> a group? >> >> Obviously we would have to tweak the gwlib/cfg.[ch] here ;) >> > > I think this is an architecture issue, and I leave it to you in deep > respect :-) > > If we have "multi-directives", I'd be lucky to use them... come on, you're just in the mood for submitting patches, go on :)) Stipe - ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org - ------------------------------------------------------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGJ3uh9ez0oeKvYs0RAmeDAJsE9gfczxM8dB0jVPydmfKyVJwg6wCg1RBy 0y0+eX7g4qZRyL0gWveLMlQ= =6GyL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
