Hi Ho! The following symbols are defined for the table:
? not yet investigated y driver has this feature, and it has been tested y? driver probably has this feature, has not been tested n driver does not have this feature N driver claims to have this feature but it doesn't work - feature is not applicable for this driver I have difficulty with `y', `y?', `N', and `-'. Specifically, by looking at the source code, I can determine `the driver has this feature' or `the driver does not have this feature'. But, how do I know that a `driver has this feature, and it has been tested' (y) unless I ask the devel mailing list whether the driver has been tested? For `driver probably has this feature, has not been tested' (y?), I think to determine the `tested' part I can ask the devel mailing list. But, how can I spot a `probable' part from the source code? Specifically, if I find that the code has the feature, is it still possible to say "probably has"? I think it is not, right? For `driver claims to have this feature but it doesn't work' (N), I think there is no other way than to ask the devel mailing list. For `feature is not applicable for this driver' (-), I think either there should be standard references around to determine that or ask the devel mailing list. So, I think a better way to update the table is by inquiring of the devel mailing list. What do you think? Best regards, Eus (FSF member #4445) In this digital era, where computing technology is pervasive, your freedom depends on the software controlling those computing devices. Join free software movement today! It is free as in freedom, not as in free beer! Join: http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=4445
