Milan, There are already several HTTP SMSC specific implementations on Kannel, the ones that Hervé mentioned are some of them.
Of course you can do it directly without Kannel, but it's a good approach to do it via Kannel, so that you always use it as your gateway and not one method for some carriers and another one for others, It's also nice to do it via Kannel cause it already implements stuff like it's internal queue, etc Regards, -- Juan Nin 3Cinteractive / Mobilizing Great Brands http://www.3cinteractive.com On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Milan P. Stanic <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 18:14, Hervé Nicol wrote: >> We have to send / receive SMS and DLRs over Claro (brazilian telco). We >> will communicate with them by HTTP. > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> If we write a patch for kannel for operator-specific HTML communication >> (just like for Clickatell, Brunet, 3united.com...), is there any chance >> that it may be included in Kannel CVS? > > You have to communicate with kannel over HTTP. Kannel have to > communicate with provider over HTTP. Why you could not communicate with > provider over HTTP without kannel. > What should be role of the kannel in your case? > > I don't like to say that you do not have good reason for that. I'm just > curious. > >> Do you have some special hints / advices on how to proceed? >> It won't be too hard for us to write this code considering the existing >> operator-specific code, but it costs nothing to ask for some advice >> before starting to work on it ;) > > -- > Kind regards, Milan > >
