Thanks for your input! I hope we can submit a patch soon. - Hervé
Le lundi 25 mai 2009 à 23:20 +0200, Alejandro Guerrieri a écrit : > Well, this implementations are nowadays confined to gw/smsc_http.c, so > it's quite simple to add a new one without bloating the rest of the > code. > > Until someone comes with some a-la-apxs pluggable architecture (any > volunteers? ;) ), that's the way to do it. Not as clean as it could > be, but fair enough imho. > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 25/05/2009, at 23:09, Milan P. Stanic wrote: > > > On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 17:28, Juan Nin wrote: > >> There are already several HTTP SMSC specific implementations on > >> Kannel, the ones that Hervé mentioned are some of them. > > > > Kannel supports SMPP, EMI, UCP, AT, several HTTP and the others > > protocols. I hope that the kannel will not become to bloated if we > > tried to push every variant of HTTP specific implementation into it. > > > >> Of course you can do it directly without Kannel, but it's a good > >> approach to do it via Kannel, so that you always use it as your > >> gateway and not one method for some carriers and another one for > >> others, It's also nice to do it via Kannel cause it already > >> implements > >> stuff like it's internal queue, etc > > > > -- > > Kind regards, Milan > > > >
