On Mon, 2009-05-25 at 17:28, Juan Nin wrote: > There are already several HTTP SMSC specific implementations on > Kannel, the ones that Hervé mentioned are some of them.
Kannel supports SMPP, EMI, UCP, AT, several HTTP and the others protocols. I hope that the kannel will not become to bloated if we tried to push every variant of HTTP specific implementation into it. > Of course you can do it directly without Kannel, but it's a good > approach to do it via Kannel, so that you always use it as your > gateway and not one method for some carriers and another one for > others, It's also nice to do it via Kannel cause it already implements > stuff like it's internal queue, etc -- Kind regards, Milan
