On Wed, 2009-06-10 at 10:02, Nikos Balkanas wrote: > I must be the one thanking you for the discussion. You see I am a wap > guy, and don't know of many of the issues that sms people face. > > The only concern is at startup. After it has bbox has started > succesfully, and therefore sms_router, started as well, it doesn't > matter. You can take all the smscs you want offline to service them. > sms_router will work with the rest of them. > > The only issue is for startup. I cannot test the scenario you describe, > because i don't have real smsc connections. However, if both connections > are active the minute kannel starts (1st case0, there should be no > problem. In the second case, the unavailable smsc should be commented out > the configuration. > > I guess the only question is: Under what circumstances bbox will start, > if the 2nd smsc is not responding?
Bearerbox should always start. Even if there is no one smsc active. Smsc can become active later for miscellaneous reasons. -- Kind regards, Milan
