On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:26:33PM +0300, Nikos Balkanas wrote: > Hi, > > I cannot find anything wrong with the code at that point. However, it looks > like memory corruption. Could you please use spool instead of file? It is > safer, more efficient and faster than file. In addition it uses different > memory structures than file and you should get away with it. > > I will update and run valgrind on it over the weekend. Unfortunately, I don't > have smsc connections, but I hope I can catch the problem with fake smsc. If > not, someone else from the list will have to look at it.
FWIW, I've done some successful testing with the smsc.pl that comes with Net::SMPP, it's simple and very limited, but good enough to setup a connection and so forth. Damián Viano(Des).
