Nope, fakesmsc implements a propietary protocol (that's why you use
smsc-type = "fake" and not "smpp") and it's useful for testing routes
and services. To test smpp you have a bunch of options, to name a few:
1. A "real" SMSC (if you're lucky enough).
2. Logica's SMSC Simulator
3. Kannel's own drive_smpp (it's on the test folder).
4. Net:SMPP smsc.pl
Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]
On 11/09/2009, at 15:12, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Thanks,
Does it work with fakesms? I don't have any real smsc connections.
I will first try to use fakesmsc, that I know from before. If i get
into trouble i will drop you a line.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message ----- From: "Damian Viano" <[email protected]
>
To: "Nikos Balkanas" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Dante Moreno" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 3:29 PM
Subject: Re: PANIC bearerbox cvs-20090902
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 01:26:33PM +0300, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi,
I cannot find anything wrong with the code at that point. However,
it looks
like memory corruption. Could you please use spool instead of
file? It is
safer, more efficient and faster than file. In addition it uses
different
memory structures than file and you should get away with it.
I will update and run valgrind on it over the weekend.
Unfortunately, I don't
have smsc connections, but I hope I can catch the problem with
fake smsc. If
not, someone else from the list will have to look at it.
FWIW, I've done some successful testing with the smsc.pl that comes
with
Net::SMPP, it's simple and very limited, but good enough to setup a
connection
and so forth.
Damiαn Viano(Des).
