for this purpose we have conn_wait with timeout... or I miss something? Thanks, Alexander Malysh
Am 05.08.2010 um 02:27 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > Because if I do what you say, then receiving something from bearerbox or any > other box for that matter will block until it receives data. Which may never > come. > That’s why I want to raise an error receiving data (by means of the shutdown > function) and after that I can finish the thread. > > Or does gwthread_wakeup(…) do the same? > > == Rene > > > From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > Alexander Malysh > Sent: Wednesday, 04 August, 2010 21:31 > To: Rene Kluwen > Cc: 'Kannel Devel' > Subject: Re: [PATCH] conn.c > > HI Rene, > > I don't get it, why you need this function? closing/shutdown of connection is > not a inter-thread communication. > > why not just? > > stop = 1 > gwthread_wakeup(...) > > Thanks, > Alexander Malysh > > Am 02.08.2010 um 16:42 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > > > Hereby I want to propose a patch in gwlib to add a function that would make > life a lot easier in smppbox. > > == Rene > > <conn_shutdown2.patch> >
