No, you don't miss anything. Seems I missed it.
== Rene From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: Thursday, 05 August, 2010 09:37 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: [PATCH] conn.c for this purpose we have conn_wait with timeout... or I miss something? Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 05.08.2010 um 02:27 schrieb Rene Kluwen: Because if I do what you say, then receiving something from bearerbox or any other box for that matter will block until it receives data. Which may never come. That's why I want to raise an error receiving data (by means of the shutdown function) and after that I can finish the thread. Or does gwthread_wakeup(.) do the same? == Rene From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: Wednesday, 04 August, 2010 21:31 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: [PATCH] conn.c HI Rene, I don't get it, why you need this function? closing/shutdown of connection is not a inter-thread communication. why not just? stop = 1 gwthread_wakeup(...) Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 02.08.2010 um 16:42 schrieb Rene Kluwen: Hereby I want to propose a patch in gwlib to add a function that would make life a lot easier in smppbox. == Rene <conn_shutdown2.patch>
