Commited to SVN.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
[email protected]



On 11/09/2010, at 11:55, Alexander Malysh wrote:

> oops, this patch should definitely go in.
> 
> 
> Am 10.09.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
> 
>> Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
>> before, leaving messages in the message store.
>> I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
>>  
>> This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before 
>> next devel-release. Votes?
>>  
>> == Rene
>>  
>>  
>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
>> To: Rene Kluwen
>> Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
>> Subject: Re: Release plan
>>  
>> Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
>> Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
>>  
>> Regards,
>> --
>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>> [email protected]
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
>>  
>> == Rene
>>  
>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
>> To: Rene Kluwen
>> Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
>> Subject: Re: Release plan
>>  
>> Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
>>  
>> I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Alex
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
>> And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
>> 
>> == Rene
>> 
>> 
>> > 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>:
>> >> Hi Rene,
>> >>
>> >> we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
>> better to delay let us know.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Alexander Malysh
>> >>
>> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
>> >>
>> >>> @Alejandro:
>> >>> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known
>> bugs".
>> >>>
>> >>> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
>> >>> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
>> >>>
>> >>> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox.
>> >>>
>> >>> == Rene
>> >>>
>> >>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
>> Behalf
>> >>> Of Alejandro Guerrieri
>> >>> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
>> >>> To: Alexander Malysh
>> >>> Cc: Kannel Devel
>> >>> Subject: Re: Release plan
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
>> branch
>> >>> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
>> >>>
>> >>> To describe the problem further:
>> >>>
>> >>> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
>> only
>> >>> observed on MO traffic.
>> >>>
>> >>> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
>> >>> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
>> >>> logs shows nothing relevant.
>> >>>
>> >>> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
>> >>> happening.
>> >>>
>> >>> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
>> >>> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
>> (pre
>> >>> meta-data).
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> --
>> >>> Alejandro Guerrieri
>> >>> [email protected]
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi together,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
>> >>>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
>> wtls
>> >>> branch.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex:
>> >>> could you please
>> >>>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
>> >>> with Kannel and whether
>> >>>> boxes ready for release?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The plan would be:
>> >>>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
>> >>>> 2) next week testing
>> >>>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
>> >>> somebody sees showstopper.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Alexander Malysh
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Best regards,
>> >  Victor Luchitz
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>  
>>  
>> <sqlbox_acks_3.patch>
> 

Reply via email to