Yes I agree with it. In my case I need to restart the box early in the morning daily (I sent around 5 millions MT/day). Need some bug fix on it.
sangprabv [email protected] http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > I've just tried to reproduce the sqlbox issue with the MO's being lost, and > couldn't. Tried with up to 100K messages using fakesmsc and all of them were > inserted on the DB. > > I've tried both with latest sqlbox SVN and also with 0.7.2 and in both cases > worked exactly the same. Perhaps something changed on Kannel's side during > last year that fixed the issue without us noticing? Anyway, it's definitely > gone for good :) > > BTW, I've been bitten by the retry bug: the few messages that failed on > smsbox (because the web server couldn't cope with them) were queued in > _memory_ (they'd be gone if I'd stop smsbox) and retried one by one on 30 > seconds interval. IMHO_that_ is a serious bug on Kannel that should be taken > care of asap. > > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:10:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:10:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:11:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:11:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:12:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:12:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:13:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:13:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 > "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" > > Settings were: > > http-request-retry = 10 > http-queue-delay = 30 > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 11/09/2010, at 11:55, Alexander Malysh wrote: > >> oops, this patch should definitely go in. >> >> >> Am 10.09.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >> >>> Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly >>> before, leaving messages in the message store. >>> I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client. >>> >>> This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before >>> next devel-release. Votes? >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> >>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30 >>> To: Rene Kluwen >>> Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel' >>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>> >>> Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of >>> Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences. >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>> >>> >>> If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case. >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] >>> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23 >>> To: Rene Kluwen >>> Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel >>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>> >>> Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it? >>> >>> I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Alex >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test. >>> And they all arrived, without losing a single message. >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> >>> > 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>: >>> >> Hi Rene, >>> >> >>> >> we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's >>> better to delay let us know. >>> >> >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Alexander Malysh >>> >> >>> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >>> >> >>> >>> @Alejandro: >>> >>> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known >>> bugs". >>> >>> >>> >>> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has >>> >>> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice. >>> >>> >>> >>> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox. >>> >>> >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf >>> >>> Of Alejandro Guerrieri >>> >>> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34 >>> >>> To: Alexander Malysh >>> >>> Cc: Kannel Devel >>> >>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>> >>> >>> >>> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data >>> branch >>> >>> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho. >>> >>> >>> >>> To describe the problem further: >>> >>> >>> >>> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's >>> only >>> >>> observed on MO traffic. >>> >>> >>> >>> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you >>> >>> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The >>> >>> logs shows nothing relevant. >>> >>> >>> >>> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's >>> >>> happening. >>> >>> >>> >>> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's >>> >>> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel >>> (pre >>> >>> meta-data). >>> >>> >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> -- >>> >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi together, >>> >>>> >>> >>>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version. >>> >>>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, >>> wtls >>> >>> branch. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex: >>> >>> could you please >>> >>>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release >>> >>> with Kannel and whether >>> >>>> boxes ready for release? >>> >>>> >>> >>>> The plan would be: >>> >>>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge >>> >>>> 2) next week testing >>> >>>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether >>> >>> somebody sees showstopper. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Thanks, >>> >>>> Alexander Malysh >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Best regards, >>> > Victor Luchitz >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> <sqlbox_acks_3.patch> >> >
