I don't think this is a showstopper because this is not a new bug. Thanks, Alexander Malysh
Am 13.09.2010 um 16:31 schrieb KangMas Willy: > Yes I agree with it. In my case I need to restart the box early in the > morning daily (I sent around 5 millions MT/day). Need some bug fix on it. > > > > sangprabv > [email protected] > http://www.petitiononline.com/froyo/ > > > On Sep 12, 2010, at 4:18 AM, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > >> I've just tried to reproduce the sqlbox issue with the MO's being lost, and >> couldn't. Tried with up to 100K messages using fakesmsc and all of them were >> inserted on the DB. >> >> I've tried both with latest sqlbox SVN and also with 0.7.2 and in both cases >> worked exactly the same. Perhaps something changed on Kannel's side during >> last year that fixed the issue without us noticing? Anyway, it's definitely >> gone for good :) >> >> BTW, I've been bitten by the retry bug: the few messages that failed on >> smsbox (because the web server couldn't cope with them) were queued in >> _memory_ (they'd be gone if I'd stop smsbox) and retried one by one on 30 >> seconds interval. IMHO_that_ is a serious bug on Kannel that should be taken >> care of asap. >> >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:41 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:09:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:10:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:10:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:11:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:11:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:12:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:12:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:13:19 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> 127.0.0.1 - - [11/Sep/2010:18:13:49 -0300] "GET /kannel.html HTTP/1.1" 200 4 >> "-" "Kannel/svn-r4838" >> >> Settings were: >> >> http-request-retry = 10 >> http-queue-delay = 30 >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> [email protected] >> >> >> >> On 11/09/2010, at 11:55, Alexander Malysh wrote: >> >>> oops, this patch should definitely go in. >>> >>> >>> Am 10.09.2010 um 22:07 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >>> >>>> Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly >>>> before, leaving messages in the message store. >>>> I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client. >>>> >>>> This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before >>>> next devel-release. Votes? >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> >>>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30 >>>> To: Rene Kluwen >>>> Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel' >>>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>>> >>>> Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of >>>> Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case. >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23 >>>> To: Rene Kluwen >>>> Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel >>>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>>> >>>> Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it? >>>> >>>> I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> >>>> Alex >>>> >>>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test. >>>> And they all arrived, without losing a single message. >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> >>>> > 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <[email protected]>: >>>> >> Hi Rene, >>>> >> >>>> >> we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's >>>> better to delay let us know. >>>> >> >>>> >> Thanks, >>>> >> Alexander Malysh >>>> >> >>>> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >>>> >> >>>> >>> @Alejandro: >>>> >>> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known >>>> bugs". >>>> >>> >>>> >>> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release >>>> >>> has >>>> >>> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> == Rene >>>> >>> >>>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>>> Behalf >>>> >>> Of Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> >>> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34 >>>> >>> To: Alexander Malysh >>>> >>> Cc: Kannel Devel >>>> >>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data >>>> branch >>>> >>> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> To describe the problem further: >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's >>>> only >>>> >>> observed on MO traffic. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you >>>> >>> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. >>>> >>> The >>>> >>> logs shows nothing relevant. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed >>>> >>> it's >>>> >>> happening. >>>> >>> >>>> >>> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on >>>> >>> Kannel's >>>> >>> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel >>>> (pre >>>> >>> meta-data). >>>> >>> >>>> >>> Regards, >>>> >>> -- >>>> >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> >>> [email protected] >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>>> >>> >>>> >>>> Hi together, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version. >>>> >>>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, >>>> wtls >>>> >>> branch. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex: >>>> >>> could you please >>>> >>>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to >>>> >>>> release >>>> >>> with Kannel and whether >>>> >>>> boxes ready for release? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> The plan would be: >>>> >>>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge >>>> >>>> 2) next week testing >>>> >>>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether >>>> >>> somebody sees showstopper. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Alexander Malysh >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Best regards, >>>> > Victor Luchitz >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> <sqlbox_acks_3.patch> >>> >> >
