I am very sure it doesn't cause problems, it was a typo. I've connected kannel with over a hundred carriers, and _never_ had problems with default smsc, however had a lot of issues with store and forward, so take your peek. IMO this change won't affect regular SMS at all, at least in my own experience.
However, I agree making it configurable would be better and you're welcome to commit a patch for it, but for the time being this could solve a few list posts about people having issues with wap push (and regular sms as well, I can tell you some carriers have issues with store and forward even for regular sms). Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri [email protected] On 10/11/2010, at 01:07, Nikos Balkanas wrote: > You don't seem so sure that default_smsc_mode will not cause problems. I > remember in the past some issues with ESM_CLASS, but were few and in between. > Store and forward has been working for most people. This change will affect > regular sms as well. Wouldn't be better to make it configurable? > > BR, > Nikos > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" > <[email protected]> > To: "Devel Kannel" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 11:21 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH] esm_class to default_smsc_mode > > > Correction: using "store and forward" causes problems. > > [Thanks Juan Nin for noting it] > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 09/11/2010, at 19:34, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > >> This patch changes the esm_class from "store and forward" to "default smsc >> mode". >> >> Using "default smsc mode" causes problems with wap-push on a number of >> carriers around the world. On the other hand, at least in my own experience >> setting it to "default smsc mode" doesn't cause any negative effects. >> >> Regards, >> -- >> Alejandro Guerrieri >> [email protected] >> >> <kannel-smpp-esm_class.patch> > >
