and how much people don't have issues? I think much more people don't have any issues with store and forward mode and only few SMSCs are buggy and therefore you need this workaround.
Thanks, Alexander Malysh Am 13.11.2010 um 22:38 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > I had issues with one of the major carriers in Argentina, for the record. > Regular SMS wouldn't work at all. > > And if you check the mailing list archives you'll se a few persons that had > to use default smsc mode in order to get wap push to work. > > Regards, > -- > Alejandro Guerrieri > [email protected] > > > > On 13/11/2010, at 22:31, Alexander Malysh wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> the same argument from me, I've also connected many carriers and never had >> problems with store and forward mode. >> I would prefer to see default store and forward and make it configurable for >> the problematic cases. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexander Malysh >> >> Am 10.11.2010 um 09:30 schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >> >>> I am very sure it doesn't cause problems, it was a typo. >>> >>> I've connected kannel with over a hundred carriers, and _never_ had >>> problems with default smsc, however had a lot of issues with store and >>> forward, so take your peek. IMO this change won't affect regular SMS at >>> all, at least in my own experience. >>> >>> However, I agree making it configurable would be better and you're welcome >>> to commit a patch for it, but for the time being this could solve a few >>> list posts about people having issues with wap push (and regular sms as >>> well, I can tell you some carriers have issues with store and forward even >>> for regular sms). >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/11/2010, at 01:07, Nikos Balkanas wrote: >>> >>>> You don't seem so sure that default_smsc_mode will not cause problems. I >>>> remember in the past some issues with ESM_CLASS, but were few and in >>>> between. Store and forward has been working for most people. This change >>>> will affect regular sms as well. Wouldn't be better to make it >>>> configurable? >>>> >>>> BR, >>>> Nikos >>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alejandro Guerrieri" >>>> <[email protected]> >>>> To: "Devel Kannel" <[email protected]> >>>> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 11:21 PM >>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] esm_class to default_smsc_mode >>>> >>>> >>>> Correction: using "store and forward" causes problems. >>>> >>>> [Thanks Juan Nin for noting it] >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -- >>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 09/11/2010, at 19:34, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: >>>> >>>>> This patch changes the esm_class from "store and forward" to "default >>>>> smsc mode". >>>>> >>>>> Using "default smsc mode" causes problems with wap-push on a number of >>>>> carriers around the world. On the other hand, at least in my own >>>>> experience setting it to "default smsc mode" doesn't cause any negative >>>>> effects. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> -- >>>>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> <kannel-smpp-esm_class.patch> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >
