Peter Jones wrote:
> "It means we have to update even more software" seems like a reason /not/
> to ship an update that isn't a bugfix or security fix. Not a reason it
> *should* be done.
1. Nowhere was it said the ABI change is NOT a bugfix or security fix. Even
security fixes can require ABI bumps, see xulrunner.
2. Sometimes even feature updates to libraries are important, because some
important new or updated application requires the new library to work. I
don't see why we should ban it just because 2-3 other leaf packages need a
rebuild. That's what grouped updates are for.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
