On 09/16/2016 11:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote:
>>> This is for the labeling of, for example, separate PHP 5, 6, and 7
>>> modules?
>> Yes.  Or even variations of the same upstream version.
>> I'm really pro-stream here because these identifiers have
>> nothing to do with upgrade paths and some modules or module
>> stacks wouldn't even have any concept of numbered, progressive
>> builds/releases.  It's just a label.
>> I would save the word "version" to identify updates within
>> these "streams".
> I agree on not using "version" for this. I'm not completely sold on
> "stream", partly because we talk about "upstream" and "downstream" so
> much, and this is unrelated to that. How about "branch"? That fits with
> the idea of "rebase" for switching between them....

What about "flow" or "journey"? With "flow", we could use the term "reflow" for
switching between them as well.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to