On Wed, 12 Oct 2016 09:55:40 -0400
Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 9:38 AM, Matthew Miller
> <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:48:36AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:  
> >> @Matt: does it reflect your thoughts ?  
> >
> > Looks like a great place to start -- thanks. The one change I'd
> > make is adding a separate "Critical" level, for things that will
> > have us pacing the halls (figuratively) continually bugging people,
> > pulling in favors, etc.  
> I agree Jan's proposal looks like a good idea.  However, I can't but
> help notice that its necessity is driven almost entirely by the fact
> that we cannot use our existing bugzilla tool to do this job for us.
> All of the extra app stuff could be avoided if we disallowed reporters
> (or random people) to change the Severity and Priority fields.

We could request this from bugzilla folks (restrict those fields to
people in fedorabugs? Or should it be more restricted ?)


Attachment: pgp90tzxZ7q1n.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to