On 21 February 2017 at 04:10, Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > Dne 21.2.2017 v 01:31 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): >> On 02/21/2017 01:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 18:24:21 -0500 >>> Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 5:20 PM, Kevin Kofler >>>> <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote: >>>>> Dennis Gilmore wrote: >>>>>> I do not get what you mean by your statement, it is extremely vague >>>>>> with no detail. can you please expand on it in the context of the >>>>>> change? and the changes it will bring to the entire workflow of >>>>>> rawhide? >>>>> >>>>> Rawhide is just nowhere near working, half the packages have broken >>>>> dependencies due to not building with the latest GCC. >>> >>> Thats a bit over dramatic don't you think? >> No. I fully agree with Kevin K. >> >> Feb 15 rawhide is 100% dysfunctional. >> >>> 968 currently on the FTBFS list, and even there many of those don't >>> have broken deps because the previous build still works. >> Many of the packages you are referring to probably are parts of dep >> chains, which gradually get fixed or have been missed during the >> official "mass-rebuild". >> >> What you are missing: Due to you keeping the package having been >> rebuilt since Feb 15 behind closed doors, NOBODY outside RH can have >> tested them and is able to go after run-time bugs these package >> introduce. > > Come on. Outside or inside RH, we are on the same boat. There are > problems which needs to be resolved. I don't understand why you paint it > as some conspiracy. >
It is Ralf's standard methodology for the last 15? years. -- Stephen J Smoogen. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
