On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11-07-17 22:57, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
>> <domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 11 July 2017 at 22:26, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I ran into this unannounced change:
>>>>
>>>>    https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Stop_Building_i686_Kernels
>>>
>>>
>>> I noticed this is categorized as self-contained, which I think is wrong.
>>>
>>> I also have hardware that would no longer run Fedora after such change
>>> (a netbook with an older Intel Atom CPU which supports SSE2, but is
>>> 32bit). Unless the change proponent can provide some numbers suggesting
>>> that 32bit users are a tiny minority of our userbase, I'll probably
>>> be against such change.
>>
>>
>> Anyone with 32-bit hardware is going to be against this change.  It is
>> a known downside.  It also doesn't change the fact that i686 kernels
>> are in a zombie state, where the kernel team does not actively support
>> them and the community has not significantly stepped up to do so.
>
>
> I still have (some) 32 bit hardware in use and I must say that I was
> not aware of this zombie state. i686 kernels have been working fine for
> me otherwise I would have likely stepped up to fix things (or if that
> was too much work replace my last 32bit hardware), but I may just have
> been lucky and never hit a bad kernel.
>
> If the kernel team wants some specific help with ia32 support then
> 2 things need to happen:
>
> 1) A clear request for help needs to be send
> 2) What exactly they need help with needs to be clearly defined

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-February/208368.html


josh
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to