On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:15:24PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM:
> >On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> >>I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname
> >>bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages:
> >Welp, the rebuild of texlive failed, which means gdal can't be built,
> >and I can't build openqa. And none of this seems to have been touched
> >since yesterday,
> Umm? Did you really check?
> >so now it's probably going to be stuck over the
> >weekend, right?
> >Perhaps next time, you could test rebuilds of at least major things
> >like texlive against the new poppler *before* you land the new poppler
> >into rawhide? Thanks.
> And then, if test rebuild of such a big package like texlive against
> new poppler fails, poppler maintainer has to wait until texlive is
> to be ported into new poppler?
Yes! That's how the new "no alphas" rawhide is supposed to
look. Maintainers are supposed to avoid a state where rawhide is
poppler shouldn't be *blocked*, but it should be delayed a bit, so
that maintainers of the dependent packages are given a few days to
find a resolution.
devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org