On Tue, Aug 08, 2017 at 10:38:15AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> >Yeah, that would get crazy fast. The 6 month granularity proposal
> >should help*some*, and we should probably go into this carefully.
> Technically, the SL for the module could have the narrow meaning
> referring to the module only, and the tools could follow the chain
> of dependencies and display it as:
> Service Level: 6 months (effective SL: 3 months/EOL: 2017-11-08 due
> to dependency on openSSL)

Ouch. Yes, but I think that that should be a warning sent to the module
maintainers (and collectively to devel list) rather than show to end

Matthew Miller
Fedora Project Leader
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to