On 08/10/2017 02:15 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> After a successful scratch build[1] on fc27/i686 of ceph-2.1.2-2 to test
> a fix for a 32-bit issue I immediately fired off a full fedpkg build,
> which failed thusly [2]:
> ...
> DEBUG util.py:439:  Error: nothing provides librpm.so.7()(64bit) needed
> by deltarpm-3.6-22.fc27.x86_64
> DEBUG util.py:439:  (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to
> replace conflicting packages)
> ...
> the scratch build had rpm- and deltarpm-3.6-21.fc27
> The fedpkg builds got rpm-4.13.90-0.git14002.1.fc27 and
> deltarpm-3.6-22.fc27  (x86_64 at least, I didn't look at the others)
> Did I just catch things in an temporarily inconsistent state? I only
> noticed the warning that rpm-4.14 is coming soon.

Yep. :)

The affected rebuilt packages against the new rpm are being signed now.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to