On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 03:52:59PM -0500, Wart wrote:
> On 08/11/2017 09:57 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 10:17:59AM -0000, Martin Gansser wrote:
> >> for f27: This is a known problem see: 
> >> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/6236
> >> They working on it right now.
> >>
> >> f26 works for me now with:
> >> $ git checkout -b f26; git push --set-upstream origin f26; fedpkg build 
> >> --nowait
> >>
> >> on f25 branch: I don't know what happens.
> >>
> >> $ git push --set-upstream origin f25
> >> Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
> >> remote: FATAL: C refs/heads/f25 rpms/nuvola-app-mixcloud martinkg DENIED 
> >> by refs/heads/f[0-9][0-9]
> >> remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/f25
> >> To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-mixcloud
> >>  ! [remote rejected] f25 -> f25 (hook declined)
> >> error: failed to push some refs to 
> >> 'ssh://marti...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nuvola-app-mixcloud'
> > 
> > Basically, in order to prevent people from creating an epel8 branches we 
> > only
> > apply the same restrictions as before (no fXX or elXX or epelXX or olpcXX
> > branches that are not whitelisted.
> > But the script that whitelist these branches but putting them into PDC 
> > doesn't
> > ask pagure to refresh its config, so PDC is up to date but not pagure, until
> > that project's config gets updated.
> > 
> > We're working on allowing the script run by the admin to trigger a refresh 
> > of
> > the config of a certain project so that right after creating the branch in 
> > pdc
> > it can ask pagure to refresh the corresponding config.
> > In the mean time admins have a way to manually ask that a projet be 
> > refreshed so
> > feel free to reach out if needed.
> 
> I'm getting a similar error when trying to create the epel7 branch for
> tcl-tclnagios:

Refresh in progress, sorry for the delay.


Pierre
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to