On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 9:54 AM, Silvia Sanchez <bhkoh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I don't think Justin won *only* because of the interview but I do think > it had a lot to do. > Personally, I think that dedicating some time to answer these questions > (it doesn't take that much anyway, I know because I did it for FAmSCo) > shows interest and commitment. > My 2 cents. > I agree. I know that, for example, I wasn't personally familiar with two of the Council candidates' history in the Fedora project (and most of the FAmSCo candidates, for that matter). I didn't know why they wanted to run, what their goals for the project were, etc. If they'd filled out the interview it would have been much clearer what their positions were and why I should vote for them and what they might focus on if elected. I would go so far as to say answering the questionnaire, or at least giving a brief statement about your goals for the position, should be a *requirement* for running for an elected position in the project. Ben Rosser
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
