On 12/08/2017 06:29 AM, Mark Wielaard wrote:
On Mon, 2017-12-04 at 15:47 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
The bottom line is that it's pretty tricky to figure this out, which is
a pity because easy debuggability is one of the important cultural
features of Fedora and FOSS. It's a regression: GDB used to point to
integrated .debuginfo packages, which was sufficient. Now, maybe GDB
should suggest installing the source RPM?
Sorry I only saw this now. I think this is simply a bug in dnf.
dnf debuginfo-install really should do the right thing by default:
https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.redhat.com%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D1494628&data=02%7C01%7Cprzemek.klosowski%40nist.gov%7C9b51d028c82b480ec83608d53e2effa3%7C2ab5d82fd8fa4797a93e054655c61dec%7C1%7C0%7C636483293944728074&sdata=Xfyb%2FfxQaCL1GWplbwgxgx%2B7cmyWfjQME1jCIkp7WzE%3D&reserved=0
Thanks for the info---that's good news.
I still don't quite understand why only some packages have the
debuginfo/debugsource split (I counted ~10k debugsources to ~30k
debuginfo). Is that an automatic process that just needs to happen over
time, or do the maintainers need to hand-polish individual packages?
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
