On Wed, 2017-12-13 at 07:00 +0100, Tomas Popela wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:06 PM, Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Sérgio Basto <ser...@serjux.com> > > wrote: > > > Thank you Michael , btw about package naming IMHO webkitgtk4 > > should be > > > > > called webkit2gtk3 and for gtk4 webkit2gtk4 > > > > > > > > > > > > > The webkitgtk4-devel package already provides pkgconfig(webkit2gtk- > > 4.0). > > > > > > > > The GNOME system for naming pkg-config files is > > > > <name>-<major-ver-series>, so it's clearer with the pkgconfig name > > > > than the package name. > > > > > > > > The naming of the packages was especially dumb in Fedora. It might > > > > make sense to add some Provides that add sensible names, too. > > The right name from upstream's POV (I talked to them when adding the > package to Fedora - and I was considering webkit2gtk3 as well) is > webkitgtk4 as the 4 on the ends means API version and it's not > connected to GTK+ version. > > But during the last Web Engines Hackfest Michael was keen on renaming > the package to webkit2gtk3 (so we are ready for GTK+ 4 based WebKit).
BTW , I checked debian package and they build webkit2gtk3 and webkit2gtk2 [1] and also his naming looks better ;) (webkit2gtk-4.0) .So I would suggest webkit2gtk3-4.0 , webkit2gtk2-4.0 and webkit2gtk4- 4.0 [1]https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/webkit2gtk > Tom -- Sérgio M. B.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
