On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com> wrote: > I have reverted the -z defs change in rawhide. A substantial number of > underlinked binaries are still shipped in rawhide after this change, either > due to explicit overrides or incomplete build flags injection. This means > that it is necessary to review built RPM packages for incorrectly linked > binaries even after the change. Considering that -z defs also causes a lot > of spurious build failures, it's probably not the way to go. > > (The work to enable -z defs is not lost—even after the revert, packages > which have been fixed so far will remain fixed.)
Maybe this change can be revisited for a later fedora release? I think there is a benefit in assuring that working libraries / biniares are produced. Also, would it be possible to print a warning instead of failing on detected underlinking? If so, I think build logs could be checked for the warning as part of the usual taskotron/bodhi(?) build checks, and errors could get fixed one by one (or ignored, in the case of false positives). That would provide the same benefit of checking all packages, but with much less overall impact on package builds (ideally, none). Fabio > > Thanks, > Florian > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
