On 03/06/2018 10:30 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> In the past we required a proven tester to sign off on testing a
> critpath package to provide extra assurance that the update worked and
> did not break critical functionality. I do not believe that we are
> using proven testers any longer. Having some requirements on automated
> testing for critpath I think could be useful. I would suggest that we
> look at how we could reuse it to a different purpose rather than
> throwing it out.

Interesting, so it had a purpose in the past but nothing uses it
anymore. We do have requirements for critical path packages to reach a
certain level of normal karma, and we do have Greenwave to enforce
automated tests. The critpath karma field does seem like it wouldn't
serve a purpose anymore, even given automated testing.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to