Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 10:00 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le lundi 22 octobre 2018 à 00:31 +0200, Robert-André Mauchin a écrit : > > Yeah all "gosetup -q" (which is gofed default) are broken because of > > your commit: > > Well I know no such a thing, there was never any gosetup macro in the > macro set, and I think I told you a year ago I would not define a > gosetup macro just to avoid typing forgesetup, unless it actually > added > some processing over the forgesetup macro. That would obfuscate specs > for no good reason and increase gratuituously the maintenance surface > (as we see *now*). > > And I doubt -q is your problem, since (*precisely for backwards > compatible reasons) it is still accepted by forgesetup (even though > it's > ignored, because it’s the default behaviour now). > > Oh, I see, I forgot to add a phantom -q to forgeautosetup as it > already > was already its default behaviour. So you're forcing somewhere a -q > that > I don't think was ever needed. I will add the -q to the macro > definition > if that makes you feel better. > > So, no biggie. Easy to fix. That's why such changes hit -devel before > anyone dreams of queuing them to stable.
And it's here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/pull-request/45 -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
