Le 2018-10-22 13:09, Jakub Cajka a écrit :
I think that it would be reasonable to test the changes against the
Fedora package base before even pushing the change in to the rawhide.
This kind of unnecessary breakage is easily avoidable if you would
spent sometime on testing this by scratch rebuilding the Fedora
packages locally, prior pushing this.
There's certainly many things that could be done better if someone took
the time to do it. But, everyone's time is limited including mine. I
already rebuild hundreds of Go packages regularly to QA the changes. It
takes days. Those 40 packages were not part of the set.
So, if we want more things to be done with the existing manpower, we
need to fix all the thousands of little things that waste the available
contributor time:
* rehost things cleanly on pagure
* clean up the maze of repurposed Go infra specs so any change or fix
can be QAed and pushed quickly
* contribute the fixes we want or need to the Fedora packages that ship
the corresponding code, instead of 'saving' time by doing messy
ill-thought workarounds in a private spec file generator
And then when things are clearly in one place this place can be used to
sync the reviews, QA runs and Koji/copr mass rebuilds. Which is clearly
not the case today.
Call that purism if you like
--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
