On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 12:16:56PM +0100, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 16.02.2019, 12:04 +0100 schrieb Fabio Valentini:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2019 at 10:29 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/mass-rebuild/f30-failures.html
> > > now says "21 failed builds". I assume that nobody fixed the other
> > > 1k+
> > > failures during the night and this result is bogus.
> >
> > I think besser82 ran a rebuild loop over all failed packages to weed
> > out the ones that failed only due to koji or networking issues.
> > It looks like that removed all rebuilt packages from the list, whether
> > or not they succeeded to build.
> >
> > Fabio
>
>
> Yes, for some unknown reason the packages are removed from the mentioned
> page as soon as someone starts a build for them. Maybe this should be
> fixed somehow.
>
> Anyways, the need-rebuild page [1] still shows them as failed.
Interesting. I see the following contents:
ausil (5):
Fedora-Cloud-Atomic
Fedora-Cloud-Atomic-Vagrant
Fedora-Cloud-Base
Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant
Fedora-Docker-Base <--------- not packages
dchen (1):
enunciate (Re-review: enunciate-core-annotations) <--------- not
something one can build
jchaloup (1):
Review Request: golang-github-garyburd-redigo <--------- likewise
martinkg (1):
andy-super-great-park
mohanboddu (3):
Fedora-AtomicHost
Fedora-AtomicHost-Vagrant
Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant
orion (1):
python3-doctutils
releng (1455): <---------- poor releng :)
0install
...
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
