Dne 01. 03. 19 v 12:11 Diogo Galvao napsal(a):
>  Problem 4: package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc30.x86_64 requires
> libexiv2.so.26()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>   - problem with installed package darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64
>   - exiv2-libs-0.26-12.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
>   - darktable-2.6.0-2.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
> If that's the case, do I file the bug reports as Fedora 30 for whois
> and darktable components, respectively? Is it enough to just mention
> this output?

This one is being addressed as part of:


Generally yes - you should file bugs for Fedora 30 release. Usually it is 
enough pasting the output and stating that you
get this when trying to upgrade from F29 to F30.

devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 

Reply via email to