On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:24 AM Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and 
> try to run:
>
>   sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync

(Some are related to missing RPM Fusion).

Error:
Problem 1: package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
 - fedora-release-29-7.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-29-1.noarch
Problem 2: package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64 requires
libprotobuf-lite.so.15()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - protobuf-lite-3.5.0-8.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - problem with installed package vlc-core-1:3.0.6-16.fc29.x86_64
Problem 3: package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64 requires
whois-nls = 5.4.1-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
 - whois-nls-5.4.1-1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - problem with installed package whois-mkpasswd-5.4.1-1.fc29.x86_64
Problem 4: package blender-1:2.79b-10.fc30.x86_64 requires
libboost_locale.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - problem with installed package blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64
 - boost-locale-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
 - blender-1:2.79b-9.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
Problem 5: package fedora-release-29-7.noarch requires
fedora-repos(29) >= 1, but none of the providers can be installed
 - package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch requires
system-release(29), but none of the providers can be installed
 - fedora-repos-29-3.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - problem with installed package rpmfusion-nonfree-release-29-1.noarch
Problem 6: problem with installed package freecad-1:0.17-2.fc29.x86_64
 - package freecad-1:0.17-2.fc30.x86_64 requires
libboost_atomic.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - freecad-1:0.17-2.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - boost-atomic-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
Problem 7: package freecad-data-1:0.17-2.fc30.noarch requires freecad
= 1:0.17-2.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
 - problem with installed package freecad-data-1:0.17-2.fc29.noarch
 - package freecad-1:0.17-2.fc30.x86_64 requires
libboost_chrono.so.1.66.0()(64bit), but none of the providers can be
installed
 - freecad-data-1:0.17-2.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
 - boost-chrono-1.66.0-14.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository

Thanks,
Jaroslav

> If you get this prompt:
>
>   ...
>   Total download size: XXX M
>   Is this ok [y/N]:
>
> you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the real upgrade. 
> Upgrades will be fine for you.
>
> But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please 
> report it against appropriate package.
>
> Thank you
>
> Miroslav
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



-- 
Jaroslav Řezník <jrez...@redhat.com>
Engineering Program Manager

Office: +420 532 294 645
Mobile: +420 602 797 774
Red Hat, Inc.                               http://www.redhat.com/
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to