On Sat, Mar 02, 2019 at 08:03:21AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-03-02 at 16:59 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:22:51AM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> > > Do you want to make Fedora 30 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time 
> > > and try to run:
> > > 
> > >   sudo dnf --releasever=30 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f30 
> > > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
> > > 
> > > If you get this prompt:
> > > 
> > >   ...
> > >   Total download size: XXX M
> > >   Is this ok [y/N]:
> > > 
> > > you can answer N and nothing happens, no need to test the real upgrade. 
> > > Upgrades will be fine for you.
> > > 
> > > But very likely you get some dependency problem now. In that case please 
> > > report it against appropriate package.
> > 
> >   15 problems… ceph, freeipa, sssd, mainly in conjuction with python2 
> > packages.
> > So core elements of distribution – I guess it is not worth to file bugs
> > for them, it could hardly be overlook during normal QA process.
> 
> No, please do file bugs if you have the time. 

  All right, then.


 Problem 1: package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core = 
1.3-25.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch
  - package hamcrest-core-1.3-25.fc30.noarch is excluded
 Problem 13: problem with installed package hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch
  - package hamcrest-1.3-25.fc30.noarch requires hamcrest-core = 1.3-25.fc30, 
but none of the providers can be installed
  - hamcrest-1.3-24.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - package hamcrest-core-1.3-25.fc30.noarch is excluded
 

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684677 *

---

 Problem 2: package python-cephfs-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 requires libcephfs2 = 
1:12.2.11-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - libcephfs2-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package python-cephfs-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
 
 Problem 3: package python-rados-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 requires librados2 = 
1:12.2.11-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - librados2-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package python-rados-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
 
 Problem 4: package python-rbd-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 requires librbd1 = 
1:12.2.11-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - librbd1-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package python-rbd-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
 
 Problem 5: package python-rgw-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 requires librgw2 = 
1:12.2.11-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - librgw2-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package python-rgw-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
P
roblem 14: package ceph-mgr-2:14.0.1-4.fc30.x86_64 requires python3-pecan, but 
none of the providers can be installed
  - package python3-pecan-1.3.2-6.fc30.noarch conflicts with python2-pecan < 
1.3.2-5 provided by python2-pecan-1.3.2-4.fc29.noarch
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
ceph-mgr-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
  - problem with installed package python2-pecan-1.3.2-4.fc29.noarch

 Problem 15: package python-cephfs-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 requires libcephfs2 
= 1:12.2.11-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install both libcephfs2-2:14.0.1-4.fc30.x86_64 and 
libcephfs2-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
  - package python-ceph-compat-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64 requires python-cephfs = 
1:12.2.11-1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - cannot install the best update candidate for package 
libcephfs2-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64
  - problem with installed package python-ceph-compat-1:12.2.11-1.fc29.x86_64

* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684818 *

---

 Problem 6: package python2-ipaclient-4.7.2-1.1.fc29.noarch requires 
freeipa-client-common = 4.7.2-1.1.fc29, but none of the providers can be 
installed
  - freeipa-client-common-4.7.2-1.1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a 
distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package python2-ipaclient-4.7.2-1.1.fc29.noarch
 Problem 7: package python2-ipalib-4.7.2-1.1.fc29.noarch requires 
freeipa-common = 4.7.2-1.1.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - freeipa-common-4.7.2-1.1.fc29.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package python2-ipalib-4.7.2-1.1.fc29.noarch
 Problem 8: package python2-libipa_hbac-2.0.0-5.fc29.x86_64 requires 
libipa_hbac = 2.0.0-5.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - libipa_hbac-2.0.0-5.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package python2-libipa_hbac-2.0.0-5.fc29.x86_64
 
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684819 *

---

 Problem 9: package python2-libsss_nss_idmap-2.0.0-5.fc29.x86_64 requires 
libsss_nss_idmap = 2.0.0-5.fc29, but none of the providers can be installed
  - libsss_nss_idmap-2.0.0-5.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade 
repository
  - problem with installed package python2-libsss_nss_idmap-2.0.0-5.fc29.x86_64
 
 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684820 *

---

 Problem 10: package python2-rtslib-2.1.fb69-1.fc29.noarch requires 
python2-kmod, but none of the providers can be installed
  - python2-kmod-0.9-20.fc29.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
  - problem with installed package python2-rtslib-2.1.fb69-1.fc29.noarch
 

 * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684821 *

-- 
Tomasz Torcz       ,,(...) today's high-end is tomorrow's embedded processor.''
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl                      -- Mitchell Blank on LKML
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to