On 3/4/19 12:47 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2019 at 09:40:32AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Also, how are the mass rebuilds envisioned? > > Just as anyone would: by opting-out of gating. > Maybe that term is overloaded. The way I see it there are two ways to opt-out: > - remove the gating.yml file in the package's git repo, not scalable > especially > for mass-rebuild > - build in the koji candidate tag directly, thus by-passing the testing tag > where tests happen. This would be the approach releng would do for > mass-rebuild. Well, to be clear, mass rebuilds already use a side tag and then are merged in. So they would just be merged into the candidate tag or whatever. > >> I can't imagine that Ruby >> rebuild will be held from entering rawhide due to some broken >> dependency. Not sure how you want distinguish the package, which is >> typically "single" from "multi" package. > > This is a decision left in the hands of the packagers, I'm pretty sure they > know > more their packages than I do and thus I'm in no position to make this > decision. I think perhaps it would be useful to easily show waivers? like a weekly waiver report or something so we could tell what packages and maintainers are waiving results? kevin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
