On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 7:35 AM Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> The ability to have multiple different builds of the same software which > users can choose between, sounds alot like the use case for modularity. > Abusing Epoch to try to address this kind of situation feels like a pretty > undesirable approach, as this problem with suddenly clashing Epochs will > illustrate. > If only there had been modularity before f29 that might have been reasonable a reasonable claim, IMO. But it wasn't. My issue is that there's no way to fix things when a mistake is made. Perhaps I misunderstand the purpose of rawhide. I appreciate that "we" try to _not_ break things in rawhide, but when they do, there should be a way to fix them. -- Kaleb
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
