On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 8:31 AM Dan Horák <d...@danny.cz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 10 Jun 2019 11:35:52 +0200
> Igor Gnatenko <ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 11:31 AM Vít Ondruch <vondr...@redhat.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > There used to be sent nagging email about broken dependencies, but
> > > it is not sent anymore. I last received such email on 11th of March
> > > 2018, so probably we don't really care ...
> >
> > The problem with that check is that it just checks if all dependencies
> > are provided by other packages, but it doesn't check if they can be
> > installed at the same time. So if I would have package with Requires:
> > foo + Conflicts: foo, that check won't tell anything.
> >
> > Same applies to rich dependencies "with", it just checks if one
> > condition is provided by anything so this check is not useful for
> > packages with rich dependencies at all…
>
> IIRC the original problem was that repoclosure used yum underneath which
> didn't understand rich/weak deps at all. Do we still wait on a tool
> using dnf/libsolv to provide equivalent functionality as repoclosure?

"Weak" dependencies make the problem insuluble.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to