On Mon, Jun 17, 2019, at 4:47 AM, Michael Schroeder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 12:12:01PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would actually really like to see rpm's multiversioning capabilities > > extended to support this. > > I'd actually prefer to drop the multiversion mode for the kernel and > instead add the version to the kernel package name.
FWIW in rpm-ostree we go to some lengths to explicitly undo the libdnf default of multiple versions for the kernel, because the ostree side of things effectively multi-versions all of userspace as well. We're always creating a new root, so there's no concern about removing modules from the running kernel (any more than there is a similar concern for userspace components). An ostree deployment includes a (kernel+initramfs,userspace) as a pair; two deployments can happen to share a kernel, or not. A bit more info in https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/1346 _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
