On Wed, 2019-07-17 at 22:00 +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > My initial reaction is that the lists of applications in categories 1 and 2 > are very short.
Category 1 is not a list. It says: "For completeness we are highlighting one example of a Category 1 application that we will always aim to maintain and keep on the air." - i.e. there are several *other* things in Category 1. It's not entirely clear from the post whether the 2, 3 and 4 lists are meant to be complete, but from knowledge and belief I think at least 2) is not: there are other things than the wiki that would fall into that category. (I sure hope openQA does, cos we can't easily run it in Openshift, for instance). > My second reaction is that this page doesn't sell me that > I should use Python in any business-critical software... I'm not quite seeing the logic there? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
