On 7/18/19 6:44 PM, Steven A. Falco wrote: > On 7/18/19 10:28 AM, Zdenek Dohnal wrote: >> >> On 7/18/19 4:10 PM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: >>> Hello, Zdenek Dohnal. >>> >>> Thu, 18 Jul 2019 15:51:33 +0200 you wrote: >>> >>>> Even the new .spec files, which do not have to be RPM spec files? >>>> Because Vim provides spec template for such cases. >>> I never used this feature, so I think it can be disabled by default. >> That's the thing which I asked for opinion on, not about syntax >> highlighting. > > Ah - now I understand. I thought you were asking about syntax highlighting. > > I had never noticed the feature of creating a new spec file from a template, > because I have my own .vimrc file, so the /etc/vimrc file has no effect for > me.
That's not true (at least on my machine). I have my own .vimrc and yet the template is loaded when I create a new spec. > > I think having a template for just this single file type is kind of > "strange". I'd personally be fine with removing that line from /etc/vimrc. > I'd expect users who want templates to set them up for themselves, rather > than forcing users to disable templates they don't want. > Yes, that's exactly what I thought. We also have rpmdev-newspec, which I typically use if I create a spec file for a Fedora package. It's irritating that they're different. Kind regards, Till _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
