On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:03 AM Josh Boyer <jwbo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 3:27 PM Ben Cotton <bcot...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/x86-64_micro-architecture_update > > > > == Summary == > > Fedora currently uses the original K8 micro-architecture (without > > 3DNow! and other AMD-specific parts) as the baseline for its > > <code>x86_64</code> architecture. This baseline dates back to 2003 > > and has not been updated since. As a result, performance of Fedora is > > not as good as it could be on current CPUs. > > > > This change to update the micro-architecture level for the > > architecture to something more recent. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:fweimer| Florian Weimer]] > > * Email: [mailto:fwei...@redhat.com fwei...@redhat.com] > > > > == Detailed Description == > > > > After preliminary discussions with CPU vendors, we propose AVX2 as the > > new baseline. AVX2 support was introduced into CPUs from 2013 to > > 2015. See > > [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Vector_Extensions#CPUs_with_AVX2 > > CPUs with AVX2]. > > Would it be possible to include some basic instructions or a script > for people to run on their systems to see if they are AVX2 compliant? > That would help them assess the impact.
They did below, grep avx2 /proc/cpuinfo. But don't bother, this will just get embarrassing and turn into a pile on. I think this should be retracted before it ends up being a phoronix article making the project look bad. Dave. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
