On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 10:59, Alexander Bokovoy <aboko...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On ma, 05 elo 2019, Clement Verna wrote:
> >On Sun, 4 Aug 2019 at 18:17, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:34, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >> >> <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 10:25:55AM +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> >> >> > > I've already done some experiments with that. I used multi-stage 
> >> >> > > builds
> >> >> > > with podman, but it's the same in principle. And yes, the sizes are
> >> >> > > smaller. What was interesting though that some additional packages 
> >> >> > > (ones
> >> >> > > that wouldn't appear in the images using the Fedora base image) has 
> >> >> > > been
> >> >> > > dragged in as dependencies. Some of them are even related to 
> >> >> > > hardware. (See
> >> >> > > the report [1] and the github repo [2].)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It'd be nice to rebase this to F30 or even F31. F29 is not interesting
> >> >> > anymore.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > A lot of the stuff in those images seems completely unnecessary:
> >> >> > device-mapper, device-mapper-libs, dracut, cpio, glibc-all-langpacks,
> >> >> > grubby, systemd-bootchart, systemd-udev.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > So that might be one area to focus on — to make sure that these 
> >> >> > > "from
> >> >> > > scratch" installations don't drag unnecessary stuff.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Yep, that sounds like a good start. I suspect that F30 might be 
> >> >> > already
> >> >> > better in this regard.
> >> >>
> >> >> Yes quite a bit has happened on the base image since F29, we have
> >> >> removed quite a few things and trimmed down the latest rawhide to
> >> >> 208MB. I am sure that can still be improved and I welcome any help on
> >> >> that :-).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I've regenerated it for f30 and f31: 
> >> > https://asamalik.fedorapeople.org/container-randomness/report.html
> >> >
> >> > I see the fedora:f31 image is 195 MB, woot!
> >>
> >> Is there a plan to add some form of CI to monitor this? It would make
> >> it easy to monitor ups/downs over time and pick up mistakes that bloat
> >> deps by accident.
> >
> >I started some effort in that sense last year, to have the Fedora CI
> >pipeline to trigger on container builds[0]. Unfortunately the CI
> >pipeline for containers is not working [1] and it seems that nobody
> >has cycles to try to fix it.
> >We could also get some inspiration from what the Docker Hub folks are
> >doing [2][3].
> >
> >And finally I would love to sunset registry.fp.o and just use quay.io
> >as our main registry that would give us for CVE scanning for free
> >using Clair[4] (that would also be one less thing to care about on the
> >infra side), but here again there is some work to be done to make that
> >possible :-)
> Do we have all the same containers in quay.io?
>
> FreeIPA upstream is relying on Fedora toolbox and main Fedora containers
> for its CI testing in Azure Pipelines. I cannot find Fedora toolbox in
> quay.io/fedora/ project.

Nope and that's what I meant by saying that this needs some works to
make it possible :-) (Pretty much configure OSBS to publish images to
quay.io instead of registry.fp.o). We also need to make sure that we
can deliver flatpaks from quay.io.

>
> --
> / Alexander Bokovoy
> Sr. Principal Software Engineer
> Security / Identity Management Engineering
> Red Hat Limited, Finland
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to