On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 7:33 PM Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 05:31:56PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > ○ Every changes to dist-git is done via pull-requests > > Erm, no thank you. Pull requests are a terrible workflow. > > It's definitely the winning workflow in the open source world today, > particularly for smaller and drive-by contributions, which I think we'd > like to encourage. And there _are_ real tracking and review benefits to > having everything go through that workflow.
As others in the thread have pointed out, mandatory pull requests just make no sense for most single-maintainer projects, which most packages probably are. > Do you have an alternative proposal? As long as PRs are opt-in, for example, if you explicitly *want* to trigger some tests or have somebody review your changes, then I'm all for it. The Stewardship SIG is using that exact workflow right now. But forcing people to open and triage Pull Requests for every single packaging change is *crazy* and will probably make it impossible for me to continue maintaining the (pretty big) number of packages I own. Fabio > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://email@example.com _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://email@example.com